In one line: A “file noting” is an entry made by an officer on a government file while examining a matter. The Central Information Commission held in 2008 that file notings are “information” under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act and therefore disclosable. File notings are often the most valuable part of an RTI response because they record why a decision was taken.
Did you know? Before 2008, the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) circulated a note that file notings were not disclosable. The Central Information Commission, in Satyapal v. TCIL and follow-on orders, held the opposite. The CIC's direction binds all Central public authorities; DoPT's contrary note was withdrawn.
On a physical file, the left side holds correspondences; the right side holds the noting sheets. Each officer who handles the file writes a dated, signed note. A decision file typically has:
The notings are therefore the decision diary. Missing them is missing the reason for the decision.
Use this wording in your RTI under Section 6:
1. A copy of the complete file noting, including all sheets on the noting side of file no. [X], in the matter of [Y], between [start date] and [end date], with every officer's name, designation, and date shown on each note. 2. Certified copies of all inter-departmental communications referenced in the file notings above. 3. Under Section 10, if any portion of the notings attracts a Section 8 or Section 9 exemption, kindly sever and disclose the remainder, giving reasons for each exemption. 4. A copy of the file movement register entry for file no. [X] showing its movement between officers during the period.
| PIO move | Counter |
|---|---|
| “File notings are confidential” | Cite CIC's 2008 direction and Satyapal v. TCIL. File notings are information under Section 2(f). |
| “Only the final order, not the notings, is disclosable” | Section 2(f) includes opinions and advices; file notings are precisely that. |
| “Cabinet decision — Section 8(1)(i)” | 8(1)(i) protects Cabinet papers. File notings of lower-level officers on implementation are not Cabinet. |
| “Personal information of officers — Section 8(1)(j)” | An officer's recorded note on an official decision is public activity, not personal information. |
| “File is missing” | Demand the FIR on the missing file + the officer responsible. See Missing files under RTI. |
| “Would disproportionately divert resources — Section 7(9)” | Per CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay, 7(9) allows change of form (inspection), not refusal. |
Always add a request for inspection of the file under Section 2(j)(i). Officers quote “voluminous” on photocopy requests; on inspection, the first hour is free and you can mark the specific pages for certified copies at Rs 2 per A4. See the inspection procedure for the full counter-strategy playbook.
No, not routinely. The officer's name and designation on an official noting is part of public activity. Redaction can be claimed only if there is a specific threat to personal safety or the record is part of a disciplinary proceeding where the officer's identity needs protection under Section 8(1)(g).
Drafts are normally not placed on the file. If they are on the file, they are disclosable. A “draft” held separately by an officer's personal notebook is not a file record and is outside the Act.
Section 8(3) overrides most exemptions after 20 years (except Cabinet papers, sovereignty-security matters, and fiduciary relationships). Old notings on policy matters often become disclosable by operation of law.
Yes. Section 2(f) covers electronic records explicitly. Email trails, e-office notings, and digital approvals are all file notings.
Draft your RTI using the template above. Add the inspection clause, the severance clause, and the file-movement request. For the full first-RTI template, see First RTI template. For the rejection playbook, see Why RTI gets rejected.
Last reviewed on: 20 April 2026