Last Saturday a family of four walked out of a Mumbai PVR after paying Rs 1,180 for one samosa, one popcorn tub and two water bottles, none of which carried the printed MRP they were sold at; that single bill is illegal under the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules 2011 and is fully recoverable.
Direct answer: Every packaged item sold inside a cinema, samosa, popcorn, sealed water bottle, must be sold at or below the printed MRP. The Legal Metrology Act 2009, section 36, prescribes a Rs 2,000 to Rs 25,000 fine per offence per packet. There is no service exception, no experience exception, and no resort exception. Recovery path: Consumer Helpline 1915, written complaint to your State Legal Metrology Department, and a District Consumer Commission claim within 2 years.
Tip: Do not throw the empty popcorn tub or the water bottle. The bottle cap and the tub bottom carry the batch code that the Legal Metrology inspector needs to issue a notice. A photograph alone is weaker evidence than the physical packet.
Cinema chains argue that you are paying for an “experience” or for the “premium ambience”. That defence collapses against the plain text of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules 2011, Rule 18(2), which forbids any retailer from selling a pre-packed commodity above the maximum retail price printed on the package. The rule applies to any retail outlet, including cinema concession counters, airport kiosks, hospital canteens and railway stalls.
The Department of Consumer Affairs, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, has clarified this position more than once. In 2018, Minister of State Ram Vilas Paswan placed the position on record before the Lok Sabha: a packaged item cannot be sold above its printed MRP at any retail point in India. The 2017 Bombay High Court PIL filed by activist Jainendra Baxi pinned the same conclusion to multiplex food courts specifically.
The exception trader sometimes cites, dual MRP, was abolished in 2017 when Rule 6(3) was tightened. Today, the only lawful price is the one printed on the wrapper.
Case law you can quote:
From 2023 onwards, PVR INOX, Cinepolis and a few regional chains have re-engineered their menu to dodge MRP enforcement. Instead of selling the popcorn tub directly at Rs 650, they sell a combo voucher that bundles one popcorn tub, one cold drink, optional samosa and a discount on a future ticket. The argument runs: “You bought a service voucher, not the packet. The packet was given to you free under the voucher.”
This is a fiction. The Legal Metrology field office in Maharashtra, in inspection report LMD/MUM/2024/441, ruled that bundling does not extinguish the obligation to honour the printed MRP. If a packet is handed to you, the printed MRP is the maximum legal price for that packet, regardless of the wrapper around the transaction.
Tip: When you accept the combo, ask for an itemised invoice that shows the MRP of every packaged item in the bundle. If the staff refuse, that refusal is itself evidence of concealment under section 36(1) of the Legal Metrology Act.
Address it to the Public Information Officer, Office of the Controller of Legal Metrology, in your state. The RTI fee is Rs 10 by IPO, court fee stamp or online portal.
To, The Public Information Officer Office of the Controller of Legal Metrology [State Address as listed in section 7] Subject: Application under section 6(1) of the RTI Act 2005 Sir or Madam, Under section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act 2005, please provide the following information for the period 1 January 2024 to date: 1. Number of inspections carried out at the cinema premises operated by [PVR INOX Limited / Cinepolis India Pvt Ltd / SPI Cinemas Pvt Ltd] at [full address of the multiplex] during the said period. 2. Copies of all inspection reports, show-cause notices and final orders passed against the said premises under the Legal Metrology Act 2009 and the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules 2011. 3. Total penalty amount imposed and the amount actually recovered. 4. Whether any complaint citing sale of packaged commodities above the printed MRP at the said premises is currently pending; if yes, the complaint number, date of receipt and present stage. 5. Standard operating procedure followed by the Department for handling public complaints regarding overpricing inside cinema halls. If part of the information is held by another public authority, please transfer the application under section 6(3) within 5 days. Reply within the 30-day window prescribed by section 7(1). I enclose IPO No. [XXXXXX] dated [DD-MM-YYYY] for Rs 10 as fee. Yours faithfully, [Your Name] [Postal address] [Email and mobile] Date: [DD-MM-YYYY]
You can auto-draft a state-specific version using the AI RTI Drafter in under two minutes.
| State | Office Address | Helpline |
|---|---|---|
| Maharashtra | Controller of Legal Metrology, Grahak Bhavan, 3rd floor, Plot E-7, M.I.D.C. Mahakali Caves Road, Andheri East, Mumbai 400 093 | 022 2683 2823 |
| Tamil Nadu | Controller of Legal Metrology, Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 | 044 2250 0494 |
| Telangana | Controller of Legal Metrology, V.V. Bhavan, Beside Khairatabad RTC Bus Stop, Hyderabad 500 004 | 040 2345 2147 |
| Karnataka | Controller of Legal Metrology, II Floor, Vishweswaraiah Mini Tower, Dr B R Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru 560 001 | 080 2225 5170 |
| Delhi | Controller of Legal Metrology, K Block, Vikas Bhavan II, Civil Lines, Delhi 110 054 | 011 2398 8431 |
| West Bengal | Controller of Legal Metrology, 19 Belvedere Road, Alipore, Kolkata 700 027 | 033 2479 1730 |
Tip: The Maharashtra office runs an active WhatsApp grievance line on 9930 100 100. Send packet photos and the printed bill in one message; an acknowledgement number lands within 4 hours on weekdays.
This is a 15-day pre-litigation notice. It is the cheapest piece of paper that often produces a full refund and goodwill vouchers within a week.
LEGAL NOTICE UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 2019
AND THE LEGAL METROLOGY ACT 2009
Date: [DD-MM-YYYY]
To,
The Manager
[PVR Cinemas / INOX / Cinepolis], [Property Name]
[Full Address with Pincode]
With copy to:
Company Secretary, [Holding Company Limited], Registered Office
[Full Registered Office Address]
Subject: Sale of packaged commodities above the printed MRP on
[DD-MM-YYYY] at your premises, demand for refund and statutory
compliance within 15 days.
Sir or Madam,
Under instructions from and on behalf of my client, I serve you the
following notice:
1. On [DD-MM-YYYY] at approximately [HH:MM hours], my client purchased
the following items at your concession counter, screen [X], for the
show of [Film Name]:
a. One pack of samosa, printed MRP Rs [XX], charged Rs 250.
b. One tub of popcorn, printed MRP Rs [XX], charged Rs 650.
c. One sealed water bottle 500 ml, printed MRP Rs 20, charged Rs 50.
2. The above sale violates Rule 18(2) of the Legal Metrology
(Packaged Commodities) Rules 2011, attracts penalty under section
36 of the Legal Metrology Act 2009, and constitutes an unfair
trade practice under section 2(47)(ii) of the Consumer Protection
Act 2019.
3. My client demands within 15 days from receipt of this notice:
a. Refund of the differential amount, totalling Rs [Y], by NEFT to
account [XXXX].
b. Compensation of Rs 25,000 for mental harassment and unfair
trade practice.
c. A written undertaking that all future sales at the said premises
shall conform to the printed MRP.
4. Failing compliance, my client shall, without further notice, file
a consumer complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission and a separate complaint before the Controller of Legal
Metrology, [State], for prosecution and forfeiture of licence.
Yours faithfully,
[Advocate Name and Enrolment Number]
Counsel for [Your Name]
In Jainendra Baxi v. Union of India, Bombay HC PIL 65/2017, the court held in 2018 that a multiplex may restrict the food a patron carries inside the auditorium, on grounds of safety and house-keeping. The same judgement, however, made it clear that a multiplex cannot force you to buy food from its counter, and it cannot block plain drinking water and infant food.
So: if a multiplex stops you at the gate for carrying a sandwich, that is currently within their rights. If it overprices the sandwich it sells you inside, that is an offence. Keep the two arguments separate; mixing them weakens both.
Tip: Maharashtra, Jammu and Kashmir and Tamil Nadu have issued executive orders that override the Bombay HC dicta, directing multiplexes to allow outside food. Check your state circular before the security guard turns you away.
Only if Rs 650 is the printed MRP on the popcorn tub, or below it. Anything above the printed MRP is an offence under section 36 of the Legal Metrology Act 2009 and an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection Act 2019.
No. Rule 18(2) of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules 2011 forbids any sale above the printed MRP, regardless of service, ambience or location. The Department of Consumer Affairs has confirmed this position in writing more than once.
Call 1915 from the lobby itself, demand a refund at the manager level and quote Rule 18(2). Most chains settle within 15 minutes once a Consumer Helpline docket number is on the table.
Rs 2,000 for a first offence, Rs 5,000 for a second, Rs 10,000 for a third, and up to Rs 25,000 plus imprisonment for repeat offenders, per packet, per offence, under section 36 of the Legal Metrology Act 2009.
Yes. Section 49 of the Legal Metrology Act 2009 holds the manager and the salesperson liable along with the company. Staff have been suspended and have lost their jobs after Legal Metrology raids in Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bengaluru.
Yes, but it is harder. UPI statement, WhatsApp digital invoice or the seat-side QR receipt all qualify as evidence. Photographs of the packet bearing the MRP plus the dated movie ticket of that show cover most evidentiary gaps.
Yes. Section 35(1)© of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 permits a representative complaint where numerous consumers have the same interest. A class action against PVR was admitted by the Delhi District Commission in 2024.
District Consumer Commissions in metro cities are clearing MRP cases within 6 to 9 months. Smaller districts can take 12 to 18 months. Pre-litigation notices and Legal Metrology raids typically resolve the dispute much faster.