Union of India v. Namit Sharma (Review) (Supreme Court of India, 2014-09-03) (2014) 14 SCC 519 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 12, 15. Restored Government-nominated IC composition; preserved reasoned-orders requirement. The 2013 directive of judicial-only IC composition was modified.
Restored Government-nominated IC composition; preserved reasoned-orders requirement.
The 2013 directive of judicial-only IC composition was modified. Government may nominate ICs as per the original Act, but the requirement that orders be reasoned and on merits is preserved.
IC composition as in Act; §19(8) reasoned-order standard preserved.
This ruling is part of the 300+ case-law corpus at RTI Wiki Case-law Database. Every named case sets a precedent that you can cite in your own §19(1) First Appeal or §19(3) Second Appeal. Information Commissions and FAAs are bound to consider properly cited authority.
Use our Citation Formatter to format the citation correctly. Pair with Bhagat Singh v. CIC (2007) (procedural objections) and Adesh Kumar v. UoI (2014) (irrelevance is not a ground) — these two Delhi HC rulings cover most everyday refusal scenarios.