Sukhdev v. SP Karnal (Central Information Commission, 2016-08-22) CIC/SA/A/2016/000123 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 8(1)(g), 10. Police verification report disclosable to applicant. The Police Verification Report (PVR) of the applicant is the applicant's own record.
Police verification report disclosable to applicant.
The Police Verification Report (PVR) of the applicant is the applicant's own record. §8(1)(g) protects only third-party informants and confidential sources, not the applicant. PIO directed to disclose; severability under §10 applied.
§8(1)(g) protects third-party informants only, not applicant's own PVR.
This ruling is part of the 300+ case-law corpus at RTI Wiki Case-law Database. Every named case sets a precedent that you can cite in your own §19(1) First Appeal or §19(3) Second Appeal. Information Commissions and FAAs are bound to consider properly cited authority.
Use our Citation Formatter to format the citation correctly. Pair with Bhagat Singh v. CIC (2007) (procedural objections) and Adesh Kumar v. UoI (2014) (irrelevance is not a ground) — these two Delhi HC rulings cover most everyday refusal scenarios.