Supreme Court of India · 2020-01-01 · Citation awaited · ★ Landmark
§4 portal publication must be live, indexed, searchable; all 17 §4(1)(b) categories — not merely some.
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2020-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | RTI activists collective |
| Respondent | Central/State governments |
| RTI Act sections | §4(1)(b), §4(2) |
| Outcome | Applicant allowed |
§4 proactive disclosure must be on a live, indexed, searchable portal — not a PDF-dump; 17 categories fully covered.
§4(1)(b) compliance requires not just publication but ACCESSIBLE publication. A static PDF dump buried on the portal does not satisfy the provision. The 17 categories must be populated, kept current, and indexed for search. Public authorities that fail face §19(8)(a) structural directions.
§4 compliance, portal, 17 categories
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.