Condonation of delay in §19(3) Second Appeal

Delay in filing §19[3] Second Appeal may be condoned for sufficient cause; Commission has equitable discretion. §19(3) 90-day limit is condonable for sufficient.

§19(3) 90-day limit is condonable for sufficient cause; Commission exercises equitable discretion.

Delay in filing §19(3) Second Appeal may be condoned for sufficient cause; Commission has equitable discretion.

While §19(3) prescribes a 90-day limitation for Second Appeal, the Commission has equitable discretion to condone delay for sufficient cause. Common grounds: illness, change of address, loss of PIO's original order.

§19(3), condonation of delay, limitation, Second Appeal

These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.

• Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur (SC 2011)
• §18 complaint vs §19 appeal — jurisdictional divide (CIC 2014)
• PIO silence as deemed refusal — Bombay HC (HC-BOM 2014)
• Partial information provided — fresh RTI for balance — CIC (CIC 2020)
• §6(3) transfer — 5-day rule strict construction — SC (SC 2022)

• All Supreme Court of India / CIC authorities rulings in the corpus
• All RTI cases turning on §19
• Full case-law search
• Case-Law Database — overview
• PIO RTI Reply Guide
• The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated

Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.