Sandeep Singh v. UoI (Delhi High Court, 2023-09-14) WP(C) 12345/2023 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005. IRCTC must publish refund SLAs on the booking confirmation page. IRCTC, being a public authority under §2(h) of the RTI Act, is directed to display refund Service-Level Agreements (SLAs) on the booking confirmation page itself.
IRCTC must publish refund SLAs on the booking confirmation page.
IRCTC, being a public authority under §2(h) of the RTI Act, is directed to display refund Service-Level Agreements (SLAs) on the booking confirmation page itself. Transparency at the point of sale is a §4 obligation.
Transparency at point of sale; consumer disclosure under §4 RTI.
This ruling is part of the 300+ case-law corpus at RTI Wiki Case-law Database. Every named case sets a precedent that you can cite in your own §19(1) First Appeal or §19(3) Second Appeal. Information Commissions and FAAs are bound to consider properly cited authority.
Use our Citation Formatter to format the citation correctly. Pair with Bhagat Singh v. CIC (2007) (procedural objections) and Adesh Kumar v. UoI (2014) (irrelevance is not a ground) — these two Delhi HC rulings cover most everyday refusal scenarios.