Gauhati High Court, Itanagar Permanent Bench · 2024-08-09 · WP(C) 145/2024
Own ILP data is personal-to-applicant; security intel is §8(1)(a) exempt.
| Court | Gauhati High Court, Itanagar Permanent Bench |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2024-08-09 |
| Citation | WP(C) 145/2024 |
| Bench | K, a, l, y, a, n, , R, a, i, , S, u, r, a, n, a, , J |
| Petitioner | Tage Tatung |
| Respondent | Home Department AP |
| RTI Act sections | §8(1)(a), §24 |
| Outcome | partly allowed |
Inner Line Permit data for the applicant is disclosable; security-sensitive border intelligence is §8(1)(a).
An Inner Line Permit holder can access their own ILP record. Aggregate ILP issuance data by post is disclosable. Specific border-intelligence briefings are §8(1)(a) sovereignty and integrity. §24 Second Schedule does not cover the state Home Department's civil branch.
Arunachal, ILP, section 8(1)(a), border, sovereignty
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.