The 1983 Supreme Court ruling that arbitrary classification of citizens violates Article 14 of the Constitution. The Government cannot give one group of pensioners a benefit and deny it to similarly-situated others without a “rational and objective” basis. This principle is widely used in RTI matters when the Government applies §8 exemptions to one citizen but not another in identical circumstances.
D S Nakara v. Union of India
The Government had a pension liberalisation scheme that benefited only those who retired after a cut-off date. D S Nakara, who retired before that date, challenged the cut-off as arbitrary under Article 14.
A 5-judge Constitution Bench held:
Apply Nakara to RTI in two scenarios:
D S Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305, AIR 1983 SC 130. Decided 17 December 1982 by a 5-judge Constitution Bench (CJI Y V Chandrachud, D A Desai, V D Tulzapurkar, O Chinnappa Reddy, B Eradi JJ).
If the same PIO's office disclosed similar information to another applicant but denied it to you, cite D S Nakara to argue the classification is arbitrary. Demand the prior disclosures via RTI to establish the comparator.
Last reviewed: 4 May 2026.