Central Information Commission · 2022-01-01 · Citation awaited
HC Registry = §2(h) public authority; admin records disclosable, case records via CPC procedure.
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2022-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Litigant / RTI applicant |
| Respondent | High Court Registry |
| RTI Act sections | §2(h), §8(1)(b) |
| Outcome | Partly allowed |
HC Registry is §2(h); administrative records disclosable; case-specific records via CPC certified-copies procedure.
High Court Registries are public authorities under §2(h). Administrative records — recruitment, budget, CAG audit responses, §4(1)(b) disclosures — are disclosable under RTI. Case-specific records (pleadings, orders) remain accessible through the court's certified-copies procedure under CPC and HC Rules, not RTI.
HC Registry, §2(h), §8(1)(b), certified copies
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.