Central Information Commission · 2024-09-10 · CIC/MEITY/A/2024/67890
MeitY-funded Section 8 companies are §2(h).
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2024-09-10 |
| Citation | CIC/MEITY/A/2024/67890 |
| Bench | V, i, n, o, d, , K, u, m, a, r, , T, i, w, a, r, i, , I, C |
| Petitioner | Tech Transparency Forum |
| Respondent | DIC |
| RTI Act sections | §2(h), §8(1)(d) |
| Outcome | Applicant allowed |
DIC is §2(h); post-award tender files disclosable with commercial-confidence redactions.
Digital India Corporation is fully funded by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. Post-award tender documents for NIC, UMANG and DigiLocker contracts are disclosable. Price discovery and L1-L2 analysis are transparent; vendor IP and trade secrets remain §8(1)(d).
Digital India, DIC, section 2(h), section 8(1)(d), tender
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.