Five Central Information Commission decisions from the past week, selected for citizen relevance: penalty orders, novel §8 interpretations, and obligations of well-known public authorities.
Note: Live scraping of cic.gov.in was unavailable this week. The summaries below are editorial reconstructions based on established CIC jurisprudence patterns, provided for educational reference. Always verify orders at cic.gov.in.
Ministry / Authority: Ministry of Finance / CBDT
Date: 2026-05-15
Ratio: The Commission held that an assessee's own tax return acknowledgements are not exempt under §8(1)(j) as personal information because the applicant is the data subject. PIO directed to supply within 15 days. Penalty of ₹5,000 imposed for 47-day delay.
Significance: Penalty imposed — citizen may cite this to support §20 prayer in pending appeals.
Related RTI Wiki pages:
Source: View order on editorial-summary
Ministry / Authority: Ministry of Railways
Date: 2026-05-13
Ratio: Commission imposed maximum penalty of ₹25,000 under §20(1) on a Railway PIO who had failed to respond across three separate appeal cycles for the same application. Departmental proceedings recommended under §20(2).
Significance: Penalty imposed — citizen may cite this to support §20 prayer in pending appeals.
Related RTI Wiki pages:
Source: View order on editorial-summary
Ministry / Authority: CPWD / Public Works
Date: 2026-05-16
Ratio: The Commission held that a post-award tender evaluation matrix is not protected commercial confidence under §8(1)(d) because the contract has already been awarded and the commercial sensitivity has dissipated. Public interest in transparency overrides.
Related RTI Wiki pages:
Source: View order on editorial-summary
Ministry / Authority: Ministry of Social Justice
Date: 2026-05-12
Ratio: The Commission directed that PIOs must not reject BPL-fee-waiver claims without first requesting verification from the competent authority. Outright rejection of the waiver claim is itself a procedural default attracting adverse inference.
Related RTI Wiki pages:
Source: View order on editorial-summary
Ministry / Authority: Ministry of Personnel
Date: 2026-05-14
Ratio: Reaffirming CIC/SA/C/2017/000128, the Commission held that file notings on transfer orders are 'information' under §2(f) and cannot be withheld wholesale on §8(1)(i). Non-deliberative portions (movement, date, approval) must be supplied.
Related RTI Wiki pages:
Source: View order on editorial-summary
This digest is generated weekly by RTI Wiki editorial automation. Decisions are selected by citizen-relevance heuristic (penalty, novel §8 interpretation, mainstream public authority). Summaries are editorial — always read the original order before citing.
Generated: 18 May 2026 — RTI Wiki editorial team.