Quick Reply: RTI Wiki is a free, plain-language reference on India's Right to Information Act, 2005 — guides, templates, case-law summaries and free filing tools, produced by an independent editorial team, reviewed against primary sources, and published under CC-BY 4.0. It is not a government site, and it is not an openly editable wiki: every page is written and checked by the editorial team.
RTI Wiki exists so that any Indian citizen can file an RTI application — or a first appeal, or a second appeal — without paying a service fee to an intermediary and without guessing at the rules. The site publishes guides on the Act's sections, state-by-state fee and procedure pages, drafting templates, case-law summaries, and free tools that generate applications and appeals. Articles link to related pages so a reader can move from a summary to the underlying statute, rule or judgment without leaving the site.
The project is produced by a small independent editorial team, led by editor Dr. Shrawan Kumar Pathak, as an editorial project of Big Helpers. Content is curated and reviewed by the team — it is not an openly editable, community-edited wiki, and it is not affiliated with any government body. Where a page helps you use a government portal, it says so, and it links to the official site for the transaction itself.
The editorial standards behind those habits are set out on the editorial policy page, and the sourcing method on the methodology and sourcing page.
Does:
Does not:
The tool suite is the practical half of the site: an AI RTI drafter that turns your problem into a Section 6(1) application with the right PIO addressing; a fee calculator carrying the verified state schedules; a timeline calculator for reply and appeal deadlines; a first-appeal builder; and a Section 8 classifier for exemption questions. All free, no login, no tracking of your matter.
The short answer is the citizen with a stuck file. The reader who arrives most often has already complained — to an office, a portal, a helpline — and has an acknowledgement and nothing else. For that reader, every page is built the same way: the answer in the first screen, the exact route in numbered steps, the template to copy, and the escalation with its dates. Students chasing exam records, bank customers chasing rejections, homeowners chasing municipal files, pensioners chasing disbursal — the facts differ, the discipline is the same.
The second audience is the person who must act on RTI replies: the advocate assembling a paper trail, the journalist checking a claim, the officer drafting a reply that will survive an appeal. For them, the case-law summaries and the rule texts carry their citations, so the underlying judgment or notification can be pulled and read whole.
Independence here has a working meaning: no government department funds or approves these pages, and no commercial intermediary shapes them. The fee pages state what the rules say — including where a state's portal is down or a rule is hostile to citizens. Where this site corrects its own past errors, the correction note says so on the page.
Last reviewed: 26 August 2026.