The editorial policy of RTI Wiki. How sources are verified, how pages are dated, how corrections are handled, and how conflicts of interest are disclosed.
Last reviewed: 20 April 2026
This page describes how RTI Wiki is edited, sourced, reviewed, and corrected. It applies to every page on the site.
Every factual claim on the site carries a citation. Citations draw from, in order of preference:
Service-provider websites, commercial filing portals, and news outlets are used only to cross-reference a primary source that is already on the page.
Corrections are public. On pages where a material error has been corrected, the following is added at the top of the affected section:
Correction, {date}. {one-line description of the error, the fix, and the source that justified the change.}
Minor corrections (typos, spelling, formatting) are not logged individually. Substantive corrections — to a section reference, a case citation, a procedural step, a timeline, or a legal position — are always logged.
Readers may submit corrections through the feedback widget at the bottom of every page. The editor acknowledges every correction received.
The editor does not offer paid legal services, does not file RTIs on behalf of clients, and does not take advertising from any entity with a stake in the outcome of an RTI proceeding.
The site carries contextual advertising (Google AdSense). Ad placement is site-wide and not article-specific. Advertisers do not have editorial input.
Where the editor has personal involvement in a matter discussed on the site, that involvement is disclosed on the page itself.
Content on this site is published under GFDL 1.3 unless otherwise marked. Citations from statutes and official sources carry their original copyright. Case-law excerpts are used under the common-law doctrine of fair use for commentary and review.
Reuse is welcomed. See the media kit for citation guidelines.
Last reviewed on: 20 April 2026 — RTI Wiki editorial team.